It's really too bad the Enola Gay is no longer flying missions.
http://wcco.com/topstories/topstories_story_162114001.html
How does this relate to advertising? Well, it doesn't. Though I suppose there's a discussion on the nature of ideas just waiting to happen. Okay, for edifying purposes, how is one able to make a distinction between a good and bad idea? What is the difference between the two and to what extent are our judgments guided or clouded by morality? The very fact a "Gay Bomb" exists points rather convincingly to the notion that good ideas are hard to come by and that bad ideas, however egregious, are sometimes hard to identify. That said, it's easy enough to say the "Gay Bomb" is a bad idea, but would you be correct?
Bookmark Beast!
4 comments:
At first glance, I thought this was a hoax of monumental proportions. This is stranger than fiction.
I can't wait for the gay and lesbian community to adopt "gay bomb" as a mocking slogan.
The entire premise of a "gay bomb" that will make opposition military hot to trot is delusional at best, and unscientific. So yes, this is a bad idea, or an idea that is based entirely out of stereotype, devoid of actual scientific evidence. Bad research = bad strategy.
I can't wait to adopt Gay Bomb as an adjective to describe reprehensible ideas.
Ex. Setting Falch up with my sister's friend was a gay bomb.
It's easy to find out whether or not an idea is bad by using my simple new one-step system.
Step #1: Is your idea centralized by the phrase "gay bomb"? If it is, bad idea.
P.S.
I hate you Burk...
Post a Comment